Skip to main content

Governance and start-ups

Growing means rethinking the balance that got you started.

A start-up’s governance evolves through its stages of development: concept, creation, seed, industrialisation and expansion. Growth, the building of teams and the arrival of investors lead founders to adapt how decisions are made and how power is shared within the company.

Changes in the capital redraw the balance of power.

The governance that carried the early days can hold growth back if it does not evolve.

Early agility rests on the founders’ trust and involvement. As the company grows, the challenge is to keep that speed while making it possible to delegate, debate and decide without depending on the founders being there all the time. We help founders clarify their shared project, divide responsibilities and organise how decisions are settled, particularly when they disagree. At each stage, we adapt the rules and the governance bodies to the decisions to be made and to the balance between founders, investors and executives, with the degree of formality required.

  • The project

    At the outset, the founders share an intention: what they want to build, with whom and at what pace.

  • The capital

    Successive rounds redistribute ownership, rights and influence over decisions. Dilution and the arrival of new shareholders lead founders to rethink their place, while keeping their vision and the development of the governance consistent.

  • The decision-making system

    Growth makes it necessary to spell out who decides, on which subjects and answerable to whom, before a deadlock occurs. The governance bodies give these responsibilities their structure as the company develops.

The Associés en Gouvernance view
Adding structure does not mean slowing down. It means setting clear rules so that no funding round, disagreement or delegation reopens the question of who decides.

You do not have to wait for a crisis to notice that the rules have changed.

The shareholders’ agreement anticipates the milestones in the company’s life: the shared vision, the capital before each funding round, share transfers, the committees created when investors arrive, a shareholder’s departure, non-competition and intellectual property.

  • The co-founders no longer contribute in the same way

    Equality at the start can mask differences of role, workload, authority, commitment or appetite for what comes next.

  • An investor joins the shareholders

    The arrival of investors or new shareholders means adapting the shareholders’ agreement, to give the newcomers the rights on which their investment was structured and to record the new commitments made by the shareholders, new and founding alike.

  • A founder becomes a minority shareholder

    The ability to influence the company no longer follows from a historical position alone. The protections, and the relationship with the majority shareholder, have to be worked on. The shareholders’ agreement is there precisely to frame that protection.

  • The chief executive can no longer decide everything

    Delegation becomes necessary, but it stays fragile as long as responsibilities, limits and escalation routes are left implicit. The operational delegation system has to be structured while staying aligned with what the shareholders’ agreement says about the start-up’s governance.

  • The informal committee is no longer enough

    An advisory board or a strategy committee can bring perspective, then reach its limits when collective responsibility and oversight become more demanding.

  • Growth is already preparing for life after the founder

    Even with no departure in view, the company needs to depend less on its founder. The shareholders’ agreement supports this by providing for transition arrangements suited to the project and to the people.

Four ways to make governance a lever for growth.

  1. Turning the founders’ vision into clear responsibilities

    We clarify roles, areas of autonomy and shared decisions, taking account of what each person actually contributes. The challenge is to align ownership, operational involvement and decision-making power.

  2. Preparing the governance before the capital opens up

    We help founders assess how the rights investors ask for will affect future decisions and the future balance of power. This work informs the negotiation of the shareholders’ agreement, alongside the lawyers who draft it.

  3. Protecting shareholders while preserving the ability to act

    We look for a balance between each party’s protections and collective effectiveness: access to information, representation, reserved matters and exit terms. The aim is to prevent deadlock without weakening essential rights.

  4. Adapting governance bodies to each stage of growth

    We define the role, composition and workings of the governance bodies according to what the company needs: an outside view, strategic debate, oversight. They evolve with delegation and growth, while preserving agility.

How we work

Supporting the stages that shift the balance

We work with founders, individually and together, then with the investors, directors and executives concerned. Each engagement meets a specific need while taking into account its effects on the governance as a whole.

  • Between founders: clarifying contributions, expectations and responsibilities to prevent conflicts of legitimacy.
  • When the capital opens up: examining the scenarios and their effects on decision-making power, alongside the legal advisers.
  • Over time: shedding light on the decisions that shift the balance, from a funding round to the hiring of an executive.
  • Through a targeted diagnosis: identifying strengths, blockages and priority changes.
  • Through an overall review of the structure: preparing governance suited to the company’s trajectory and its major transitions.

The team

Talking capital, governance and execution in the same conversation.

Our partners work in pairs, alongside executives, shareholders and boards. They can move from a clause in a shareholders’ agreement to the composition of a governance body, and on to how a decision will actually be carried out.

The pair brings together specialists in the start-up world who take a multidisciplinary approach to governance — not solely a legal, financial or relational one.

Let’s work together on governance that serves your start-up’s development and growth.